There's a big difference here between the best and worst scouts. If you tell him to find attackers, for example, you don't want him to come back with a bunch of defenders. The more players you get on each report, the better the chances of a gem being nestled among them.Įxperience does something else, though – it determines how likely the scout is to find the type of player you're after. Regarding experience, what is meant by “a larger number of players”? Well, scouts with five stars in experience will bring back five to seven players on each report one-star experience scouts will only give you one to two players each month. “Judgment: A scout with better judgment will find higher quality players.” Players like "prime" Michael Essien (his second-best version) or "baby" Patrick Vieira (his lowest-rated version) are not considered good enough to compete with the best squads this late in the cycle.- “Experience: A more experienced scout will find a larger number of players.”
Instead, the recently introduced Icon Swaps feature has only given players the chance to earn low-tier versions of old stars, even in March. No comparable Icon SBCs have appeared this season. Icon SBCs lowered the cost of legends on the marketplace, keeping them in purchasable range for those who only used the game's currency to buy players. These could take the average gamer a decent amount of time, but the objective was met with a top-tier reward, like the best version of Thierry Henry or another superstar. EA originally showcased a system that unlocked decent prizes for completing matches and objectives, but changes elsewhere have rendered this useless.įor example, last year's Icon Squad Building Challenges allowed players to slowly work towards earning a legend for their club. Rewards for players who put in time, and no cash, were expected to significantly increase this year. Nothing substantial ever seems to be done to fix it. Like AI defending, lag and input delay has been prominent for years and continues to impact results. To make things worse, consistent server issues hamper the game online. The early signs aren't hugely promising, though, as "drop back" still remains too powerful and tedious to play against.
This would, in theory, lower the amount of time the technique could be used in matches.
In EA's 12th title update, it was confirmed overload ball side would weigh heavier on each player's stamina. Recent efforts have been made to combat the problem, though. This has had a knock-on effect across multiple modes and even FIFA esports, which has seen matches become less watchable and far tougher to invest in. The trend has evolved more aggressively than we anticipated. It will be interesting to see how this trend develops as people get used to the game." "The prominence of pace is forcing a certain style of play online notably an extremely deep back line with players dropping back to plug their own half. This results in low-scoring games in which possession is unevenly split and there are few shots on goal. Your lineup automatically moves toward the side of the pitch the ball is on, meaning it's a constant shadow for the opposition's attacks.Īdd in the "drop back" instruction-which brings forwards deep to defend-and an impenetrable wall is created. This method funnels your team into the centre of the pitch, narrowing play and overloading on numbers in the middle. Chasing back with a midfielder while leaving your defence controlled by the computer is still way too effective, especially when combined with the "overload ball side" tactic that has become popular online.
The main reason for this has been a problem during the Frostbite engine years: AI defending is overpowered. For much of its life cycle, FIFA 20 has been a defence-heavy borefest that rewards players who have the patience to wait for mistakes. The need to overcome discrepancies through patches is no issue it's the speed and efficiency of the response that should be brought into the spotlight.
0 kommentar(er)
